i am always annoyed by these analyses that show how "missing the best x days" hurts returns but do not show the benefit of "missing the WORST x days." of course it's hard to predict either best or worst, but showing just half the analysis is really worthless and misleading.
i am always annoyed by these analyses that show how "missing the best x days" hurts returns but do not show the benefit of "missing the WORST x days." of course it's hard to predict either best or worst, but showing just half the analysis is really worthless and misleading.